Ixsight is looking for passionate individuals to join our team. Learn more
Ixsight is looking for passionate individuals to join our team. Learn more
The sanctions are key in influencing the behavior in the complex web of societal expectations, legal practices, and international relationships. In my personal life, as well as in global relations, it is important to know what positive and negative sanctions are. Positive sanctions encourage conformity and negative sanctions discourage deviance as a way of ensuring order. These notions are discussed in this blog, including the definition, examples, and the ways they are used in law and economics. We will also look at sanctions screening software, which is an important tool to use by businesses that operate in a highly regulated world.
Sanctions are controlling mechanisms that have an effect on individuals, organizations, and nations. They serve to impose social norms in sociology, justice in law, and to resolve geopolitical tensions in economics. As global trade and finance become questionable, understanding what a negative sanction is and what a positive one is can save one from the embarrassment of making an expensive error. Sanctions, according to the experts, affect personal conduct in international economies, and the economic sanctions alone cause trillions of dollars in trade per year. In the post, the definitions of positive sanction, negative sanction, the legal sanctions, economic sanctions, examples of economic sanctions, and the function of sanctions screening software will be explained.
Positive sanction is a reward or other incentive awarded to reinforce positive behavior or abidance. Positive sanctions in social sciences strengthen behaviour that is conforming to societal expectations, which leads to harmony and productivity. They may be official, such as promotions or awards, or unofficial, such as commendation or social acceptance.
The idea is based on the social control theory, according to which positive sanctions induce compliance with rules. An example of a positive sanction is when an employee is given a bonus because of surpassing targets in a workplace where the motivation would increase, leading to the same being done by others. Gold stars or scholarships play a role in education where academic excellence is rewarded, thereby creating a culture of achievement.
Positive sanctions do not apply only to individuals, but also to groups and countries as well. Positive sanctions may be used in international relations, albeit not very often, and this may comprise trade incentives or aid packages to adhere to human rights standards. An example is the accession incentives of the candidate countries by the European Union, which provides economic rewards for democratic reforms.
These sanctions work on the principle of operant conditioning, where rewards elevate recurrent behavior. This makes them good as they attract both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and hence, compliance would be rewarding instead of compulsory.
Nevertheless, excessive use of positive sanctions may result in entitlement or a lack of internal motivation. It is important to balance with other controls. The positive sanctions in legal cases may take the form of a lighter sentence for the good or tax exemptions to the compliant businesses.
There are numerous examples: volunteer service recognized by the community and such rewards as loyalty points in the store or diplomatic compliments. Trust and cooperation can be established through positive sanctions, especially in different societies. They are the opposite of negative sanctions, which we are going to discuss.
Negative sanctions are punitive actions or discouragement that are put in place to deter unwanted behavior or nonconformity to norms. These may be mild reprimands to harsh punishments with the purpose of creating obedience through the fear of punishment. Negative sanctions in sociology ensure that social order is observed by indicating unacceptable behavior.
Formal punishments may be fines, jail, or embargoes, whereas informal ones involve social ostracism or ridicule. Indicatively, when a student is caught cheating and detained, a sanction is imposed on him, which discourages future occurrences.
Negative sanctions prevail in international affairs, including economic restrictions on countries that break international standards. This is depicted by the sanctions imposed by the U.S. on Iran in its nuclear program, where trade was restricted in order to coerce a change in the policies.
Negative sanctions are based on the theory of deterrence in which the potential punishment value is greater than the utility of deviance. They might work well in short-term conformity, but they might cause resentment or avoidance when they are seen as unjust.
Examples are numerous: the volunteering service that is acknowledged in the community and the reward, such as loyalty points in the shop or even diplomatic compliments. Positive sanctions can enable the development of trust and cooperation, particularly in other societies. They are the converse of negative sanctions, which we are about to discuss.
Critics also believe that negative sanctions have the ability to intensify inequalities because they are high among vulnerable populations. Negative sanctions used in workplaces include demotions or reprimands; however, when they are overused, this may become detrimental to morale.
They can be as speeding tickets, social shaming in the media, or bans on trades. The knowledge of negative sanctions may be useful in understanding their contribution to the balanced control systems, together with positive ones.
The main distinction between positive and negative sanctions is the way they operate: positive sanctions reward conformity, whereas negative sanctions reward deviance. Positive sanctions are motivational; they add benefits to encourage compliance. Negative sanctions discourage compliance by making them suffer costs, and coercion is used in most cases.
Positive sanctions, in comparison to negative ones, establish positive relationships and long-term motivation, and negative ones can create fear, but they do run a risk of backlash. Using positive reinforcement as an example, rewarding a child when they share (good) and punishing when they do not share (bad).
Positive sanctions are active, and they encourage desirable actions, whereas negative sanctions are responsive and respond to offenses. There should be a balance in societies, which can be achieved by overemphasizing the negative side, which may result in rebellion.
Table: Positive vs. Negative Sanctions
| Aspect | Positive Sanction | Negative Sanction |
| Purpose | Encourage desired behavior | Discourage undesired behavior |
| Mechanism | Rewards (e.g., praise, bonuses) | Punishments (e.g., fines, ostracism) |
| Examples | Promotion at work, medals | Fines, imprisonment |
| Psychological Impact | Builds motivation and trust | Instills fear, may cause resentment |
| Effectiveness | Long-term behavioral change | Short-term compliance |
This dichotomy extends to legal and economic realms, where negative sanctions predominate but positive incentives complement them.
To a pragmatic extent, it is better to mix the two. In the case of business, both negative and positive sanctions, such as rewards and punishments, are imposed respectively, in case of ethical behavior and non-compliance.
Source: helpfulprofessor.com
Infographic defining negative sanctions with examples and theorists.
Legal sanctions refer to punishments or inducements that are imposed by the law to maintain justice and order. They comprise fines, imprisonment, community service, or seizure of assets as a deterrent and rehabilitative measure for violations.
The criminal law may include imprisonment, whereas in civil law, the penalty may include fines. Courts issue them to act as a punishment, a deterrent, and a security to society.
The use of legal sanctions is positive, such as a pardon or a slight decrease in sentences in case of cooperation, although the main ones are negative. International laws are imposed by international bodies such as the UN, and they are aimed at preventing abuses of human rights.
Compliance is very important; failure to comply increases penalties. Sanctions screening is used to prevent legal traps in businesses.
Examples: U.S. court penalties on contempt, or fines in the EU on data breaches. Sanctions are developed in line with societal values, with restorative justice.
Economic sanctions are limitations imposed by governments to impact foreign policy or to sanction an offense, normally negative. These are trade barriers, asset freezes, and financial restrictions, which are meant to isolate targets on the economic front.
What are economic sanctions? They are instruments of diplomacy, which are not as violent as military intervention but are effective. The U.S. is first with more than twenty-six regimes.
Types of economic sanctions:
They may be full-scale or focused. Some are effective; some make us change, others stiffen our spine.
Humanitarian implications and disruption of world trading are among the consequences. Companies are required to screen in order to be compliant and not to be fined.
Source: education.cfr.org
Venn diagram of global sanctions regimes by the UN, US, and EU.
Sanctions screening software is an automated sanctions screening against watchlists to guarantee adherence to sanctions regimes. It is crucial to AML, as it detects customer, transaction, and partner risks.
It has real-time monitoring, AI-based matching, and database integration with the lists of EU, UN, and OFAC. Such tools as LexisNexis or sanctions.io minimize false positives, simplifying the procedures.
Such software is essential in 2025, when there will be increased geopolitical tension. It avoids unintentional interactions with sanctioned businesses and fines of up to several million dollars.
The choice of appropriate sanctions screening software is important in the changing environment of financial crime compliance to reduce risks at an optimal cost and efficiency. We have discussed three of the top solutions below: Sanctions.io, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, and NICE Actimize. The tools are distinguished by artificial intelligence skills, real-time changes, and smooth integrations, which assist organizations in navigating the complicated regulations, such as the OFAC, EU laws, and the FATF.
sanctions.io is an easy-to-use, API-driven portal specializing in AML, KYC, and trade compliance, which will be perfect for fintechs, as well as mid-sized companies that want to remain affordable without compromising on reliability. It has intelligent AI-based screening of more than 75 global sanctions lists, PEPs, and criminal watchlists of over 50 countries, including the UN, EU, US, and 50+ countries, updated every 15-60 minutes to keep up to date. The major characteristics are that it has a RESTful API to check it in batch and real-time, fuzzy matching to minimize false positives, and pre-built connectors to other tools, such as SAP and HubSpot.
LexisNexis Risk Solutions has the best business-level watchlist screening, which drives compliance in world banks and governments with its scalable technology. The main products, such as Bridger Insight XG and WorldCompliance Data, offer current information on sanctions, including PEPs, adverse media, state-owned companies, and registration lists, in line with the regulations, including the USA PATRIOT Act and the OFAC. Part of the advanced capabilities consists of risk-based tuning, which can be configured to reduce false positives by as much as 50 percent, automated consumer and continuous monitoring onboarding, and ongoing monitoring and entity resolution, which resolves consumer, business, and risk data into a single profile.
NICE Actimize provides decision-centric AML and sanctions solutions, which use AI to protect trillions of daily transactions in financial markets. With its X-Sight suite, such as the WL-X watchlist screening, it performs real-time party and payment screening to sanctions, PEPs, and adverse media with fuzzy matching, natural language processing, and machine learning. The notable ones include ActOne, which handles alert management, cutting false positives by 70% through AI prioritization and network analytics, which is used to find hidden links in sophisticated laundering patterns. It focuses on regulatory coverage, such as FATF GreyLists (e.g., Laos in Feb 2025), as well as entity resolution to modernize KYC, in 2025, when the foundation predicts an increased focus on sanctions and information sharing (according to the AML Outlook by NICE).
The way it is implemented is through data integration and regular updates. The trends of the future are AI and blockchain to improve accuracy.
Also read: What is the difference between sanctions and embargoes?
Learning how to distinguish between the positive and negative sanctions sheds light on them in society, law, and economics. Positive and negative sanctions motivate and scare away, respectively, and in combination, they can bring compliance. As economic sanctions determine the world and software like sanctions screening programs protect companies, it is important to be up to date. Learn to accept these lessons and live in a complex world.
Ixsight provides Deduplication Software that ensures accurate data management. Alongside Sanctions Screening Software and AML Software are critical for compliance and risk management, Data Scrubbing Software and Data Cleaning Software enhance data quality, making Ixsight a key player in the financial compliance industry.
Our team is ready to help you 24×7. Get in touch with us now!